Discover how high-speed Cold Heading technology can cut steel ball production time by up to 40%. By forming components rapidly and consistently with fewer processing steps, this advanced method improves production efficiency, reduces material waste and labor costs, and supports higher output without compromising quality. Manufacturers can achieve more stable dimensions, shorter cycle times, and faster order fulfillment, giving them a stronger advantage in demanding markets. Explore how upgrading to high-speed cold heading can streamline steel ball manufacturing, accelerate overall performance, and deliver greater value from every production run.
Many steel ball manufacturers lose production hours without seeing where the delay begins.
The issue may not come from machine speed alone. Wire preparation, die changes, feeder settings, lubrication, inspection, and short stoppages can all extend the time needed to complete a batch. A high-speed cold heading line can help reduce this waste, but the result depends on the material, ball size, tooling condition, and production setup.
In some suitable production conditions, a high-speed cold heading process may reduce total steel ball production time by up to 40%. This figure should be treated as a target range, not a fixed result.
I do not measure only the forming cycle.
I record the time from wire loading to the completion of an accepted batch. The record should include:
This gives me a clearer view of where time is being lost.
A machine may produce one part quickly while the full batch still takes too long. For example, a 10-second die change repeated several times can create more delay than a small difference in forming speed.
Steel ball production requires stable forming pressure and controlled material flow.
Before selecting a high-speed cold heading machine, I check:
A machine designed for small precision balls may not suit larger balls or harder steel wire. The machine must have enough forming capacity for the material and size being processed.
When the machine, wire, and tooling are properly matched, operators can reduce repeated adjustments and maintain a steadier production rhythm.
Wire quality has a direct effect on cold heading stability.
I check the wire for:
Poor wire preparation can cause cracking, feeding errors, die wear, and surface marks on the finished ball. These problems lead to stops and rejected parts.
A simple incoming inspection plan can prevent many delays. Measuring wire diameter at several points and checking the surface condition takes little time compared with stopping a running line to solve a feeding problem.
A high-speed machine cannot save much time if setup work remains slow.
I use a setup checklist that covers:
Confirm the correct wire specification.
Install the selected die set.
Check die alignment.
Set the feeder and cut-off length.
Confirm lubricant flow.
Run a controlled trial batch.
Inspect ball diameter, roundness, surface condition, and flash.
Record the approved machine settings.
The approved settings become a reference for the next batch. Operators do not need to start from zero each time.
Pre-staged tools can also shorten changeover work. The die set, measuring tools, lubricant, and inspection documents should be ready before the machine stops.
Higher speed does not always mean better output.
If the line runs beyond the stable range of the material or tooling, several problems may appear:
I prefer to increase speed in small steps while monitoring part quality and machine load. The best setting is the highest stable speed that keeps the product within specification.
This approach may produce fewer parts per minute than the machine’s maximum setting, but it can improve accepted output across the full shift.
Inspection should not wait until the end of the batch.
I check samples during production for:
Early checks help identify drift before a large quantity needs rework. A production record should connect each sample to the machine setting, material batch, tooling condition, and operator note.
The data also helps show whether a time reduction comes from better process control or from running the line at an unsafe speed.
Consider a plant producing small carbon steel balls.
The existing process takes 10 hours to complete a batch. The forming cycle is acceptable, but the line loses time through repeated die adjustments, manual setup checks, short feeder stops, and late-stage inspection.
The plant introduces a high-speed cold heading machine and changes the work method:
If the complete batch time falls from 10 hours to 6 hours, the reduction is 40%. This result comes from the combined process changes, not machine speed alone.
Another plant using larger balls, harder wire, or tighter tolerances may see a smaller reduction. That difference is normal. Production conditions must be measured before making a time claim.
I compare the old and new process with the same basic measures:
A useful comparison covers several batches, not one shift. A single good run may come from a favorable material batch or a new tool. Repeated records provide a more reliable view.
The main target should be accepted output, not only machine speed. Producing more parts with a higher rejection rate may increase cost and create extra work for inspection and sorting.
When I review a high-speed cold heading solution, I ask for process details rather than a single output number.
Useful questions include:
A clear answer should explain the test conditions. If the result is based only on a short machine trial, it should not be treated as a full production guarantee.
A 40% reduction in steel ball production time can be possible when the original process contains avoidable setup delays, unstable feeding, slow die changes, or repeated inspection stops.
It is not a universal result.
The machine must fit the product. The wire must be suitable. Tooling and lubrication must remain stable. Operators need clear settings and inspection steps. The production team also needs enough data to separate real improvement from a temporary gain.
I use the 40% figure as a process review target. I do not use it as a promise for every factory.
The safest path is to measure the current batch time, run a controlled trial, compare accepted output, and adjust the process based on actual records. This method helps manufacturers decide whether high-speed cold heading can reduce production time while keeping steel ball quality within the required range.
Making steel balls faster and smarter starts with a simple question: where does production lose time?
A line may run at high speed, yet still face uneven hardness, surface marks, oversized rejects, or long inspection delays. These problems affect more than output. They can lead to bearing noise, poor valve sealing, unstable grinding results, and extra sorting work.
I look at steel ball production as one connected process. Material choice, forming, heat treatment, grinding, inspection, and data control must work together. Improving one step while ignoring the others often moves the problem downstream.
Start with the right material
Steel balls used in bearings, valves, pumps, and grinding systems do not all need the same material.
Bearing applications often use chrome steel, such as 100Cr6 or similar grades, because the balls need a balance of hardness, wear resistance, and dimensional stability. Low-carbon steel may fit other applications after case hardening. Stainless steel can be selected when corrosion resistance matters.
I check these points before production begins:
A clear material plan reduces adjustments later. It also helps the production team set suitable forming and heat treatment parameters.
Reduce forming time with stable equipment
Steel ball production may involve heading, upsetting, flashing, and other forming operations. Small changes in tool wear, feed length, or material temperature can affect the ball blank.
I focus on three controls:
A simple weight check can reveal a problem before it becomes a large batch issue. If the blank weight begins to move outside the target range, the team can inspect the feeder or forming die instead of waiting for final inspection.
Tool replacement also needs a clear rule. Replacing tools too early may raise cost. Replacing them too late may create poor roundness and extra grinding work. A record based on production quantity, surface condition, and dimensional results gives operators a better reference than time alone.
Use heat treatment as a controlled process
Heat treatment affects hardness, toughness, wear behavior, and dimensional change. A short cycle may leave the ball too soft. Excessive heating may increase distortion or oxidation.
I track the parts that directly affect results:
The furnace should not be judged only by its displayed temperature. Operators also need records from different positions inside the furnace. A loaded basket may have temperature differences between the center and the outer layer.
For example, if a batch shows acceptable hardness near the surface but wider variation in the core area, the issue may relate to loading density or air circulation. Changing the full recipe without checking the load pattern may not solve the cause.
Make grinding more efficient
Grinding often decides the final roundness, surface finish, and size. When grinding allowance is uneven, the machine spends more time removing material. The result may be slower production and greater wheel wear.
I improve this stage by checking:
Grinding should remove only the material needed to meet the drawing. Too much allowance creates longer cycle times. Too little allowance may leave forging marks or heat treatment defects.
Coolant management also affects production. Dirty or poorly filtered coolant can carry particles back into the contact area. This may create scratches that are hard to explain during final inspection. Regular filtration and simple visual checks can prevent repeated surface problems.
Build inspection into the line
Inspection does not need to wait until the whole batch is finished. I prefer a mix of process checks and final checks.
During production, operators can monitor:
A sampling plan should match the application and customer specification. Precision steel balls for bearings may require tighter control than balls used in a less demanding industrial application.
Measurement equipment also needs care. Micrometers, roundness testers, hardness testers, and surface roughness instruments should be checked and calibrated based on the company’s quality system. A measurement result is useful only when the equipment and method are suitable.
One practical method is to keep a sample from each production lot. If a customer reports unusual noise or wear, the retained sample and process record can help the team review the batch without guessing.
Use data that operators can understand
A smart production line does not need to begin with a complex software system. It can start with consistent records.
I recommend recording:
The purpose is not to create paperwork. The purpose is to see patterns.
If surface defects appear after a specific tool has reached a certain production count, the record can show the connection. If hardness variation follows a certain furnace load pattern, the team can test that condition. If one grinding machine produces more out-of-round balls, maintenance can focus on that machine.
A simple dashboard can display daily output, rejection rate, average cycle time, and the main defect types. Operators can respond faster when the information is visible and easy to read.
A practical example
A small bearing component plant may notice that its steel ball line meets the monthly output target, yet the rework rate remains high. The team reviews the process and finds three causes:
The plant adds a blank-weight check, uses a fixed loading method, and sets a wheel inspection rule based on production quantity and surface results. The line does not need a complete equipment replacement. Better control at three points can reduce rework and make production more predictable.
The exact result depends on the machines, material, product size, and customer requirements. A trial batch should be reviewed before applying any change to the full production plan.
Choose improvements that fit the product
Faster production does not mean pushing every machine to its highest speed. A higher speed may increase vibration, heat, tool wear, or inspection failures.
I usually compare four figures before changing a process:
A line that produces more blanks but creates many rejected balls may not be faster in practice. A moderate speed with stable quality can give the factory better delivery control and fewer interruptions.
Smarter production also depends on people. Operators who understand why a parameter matters can react to changes with better judgment. Clear work instructions, short training sessions, and easy-to-use records often bring more value than adding another control screen.
Steel balls become faster and smarter to produce when each stage supports the next one. Stable raw material, controlled forming, consistent heat treatment, efficient grinding, timely inspection, and useful data create a stronger production system.
I do not treat speed and quality as separate goals. When the process is measured properly, waste becomes easier to find, equipment problems appear earlier, and the production team can improve without relying on guesswork.
High-speed cold heading can raise production output, but speed alone does not solve every shop-floor problem. When wire feeding, die life, lubrication, and inspection are not ready, a faster machine may create more rejects, more downtime, and higher maintenance costs.
I look at cold heading as a complete production system. The target is not only more pieces per minute. The target is a stable process that produces acceptable parts with controlled material use and predictable operating costs.
Start with the material
Wire quality has a direct effect on forming stability. Diameter variation, surface defects, poor coating, and inconsistent hardness can cause feeding errors or uneven forming loads.
Before increasing machine speed, I check:
A fast cold heading machine cannot compensate for unstable incoming material. A small variation in wire size may appear as a cracked head, incomplete fill, or oversized feature after forming.
Match the machine to the part
High-speed cold heading works well for repeat-volume parts such as bolts, rivets, pins, and small formed components. The machine should match the part geometry, material, diameter, cut-off length, and forming sequence.
I review several points before selecting or adjusting equipment:
A simple two-station part may not need a complex machine. A multi-step fastener with a deep socket feature may require more stations and tighter control of material flow.
This matching process helps prevent a common mistake: choosing a machine based only on its rated strokes per minute.
Increase speed in controlled steps
When a production line needs more output, I prefer a gradual speed test. The team can record part quality, vibration, temperature, tooling wear, and rejection rate at each stage.
A practical test may include:
For example, a fastener plant producing small steel bolts may raise output from 140 parts per minute to 160 parts per minute. The change may look positive on paper. If scrap increases from 1.5% to 4%, the actual gain may be much smaller after rework, sorting, and material loss.
Measured output gives a more useful picture than machine speed alone.
Protect the tooling system
Dies and punches carry high forming loads. At higher speeds, heat and impact can rise quickly. Tool design, coating, clearance, and alignment all affect service life.
I pay close attention to:
A worn punch can change head height, drive torque, or surface appearance. Detecting the problem early helps the operator correct the process before a large batch is affected.
Tool life also depends on the material and part shape. A tooling setup that performs well for low-carbon steel may need changes when the line forms stainless steel or another harder alloy.
Use lubrication as a process control
Lubrication reduces friction between the material and tooling. It also affects heat, surface finish, forming force, and die wear.
The shop should control:
Too little lubrication can increase friction and cause scoring. Too much may create handling or cleaning problems. The right setting depends on material, part design, forming load, and machine speed.
I recommend recording lubricant checks with the same care used for dimensional inspection. Small changes can influence the process across an entire shift.
Build quality checks into the line
High-speed production needs fast feedback. Operators should not wait until the end of a batch to discover a forming issue.
Useful checks may include:
The inspection plan should reflect the risk of the part. A cosmetic mark may need a different response from a crack that affects assembly performance.
One common production case involves a part that meets length requirements but has incomplete material fill around the head. A length-only inspection may pass the batch. A profile check can reveal the forming issue earlier.
Reduce downtime through maintenance planning
Output depends on running time. Short stoppages from wire feeding, transfer errors, loose fasteners, or sensor faults can remove much of the expected gain.
A maintenance plan can include:
I also suggest tracking the reason for every stop. “Machine stopped” is not enough. A note such as “wire misfeed after coil change” gives the team a clear problem to address.
The best speed setting is the one that supports steady production, acceptable quality, manageable tooling wear, and safe operation. A cold heading line should be adjusted with data from the actual part, material, and process. That approach helps manufacturers improve output without treating speed as the only measure of performance.
When I try to cut production time, I do not start by asking the team to work faster. That approach can create rushed checks, rework, and customer complaints.
I start by looking at where time is lost.
A production line may wait for materials, repeat the same setup, search for tools, or stop because a quality issue appears late in the process. These delays often stay hidden because each one looks small. Together, they can reduce output and place pressure on the whole team.
The goal is simple: remove avoidable delays while keeping quality checks in place.
Map the full production process
I begin by writing down every step from order review to shipment.
The list may include:
I record the time used at each stage. I also record waiting time.
This gives me a clearer picture of the real production cycle. A machine may run for four hours, while the order spends two days waiting for approval, materials, or inspection. Looking only at machine time can hide the main problem.
A simple process map helps the team discuss facts instead of guesses.
Find the repeated delays
Once I have the data, I look for patterns.
Common causes include:
I focus on delays that happen often. A five-minute delay repeated twenty times may cause more lost time than one longer delay that happens once a month.
My view is practical: fix the repeated small problems before investing in major equipment.
Prepare materials before production starts
Material preparation can affect the whole schedule.
I ask the team to confirm quantities, labels, specifications, and work instructions before the production order reaches the line. When materials are ready at the workstation, operators spend less time walking, searching, and checking basic details.
A food packaging plant, for example, may lose time when film rolls, labels, and cartons are released separately. A simple pre-production checklist can help staff confirm that all items are available before the line starts.
The checklist should stay short. If it becomes difficult to use, people may skip it.
Reduce setup time with standard work
Setup time often changes from one operator to another. One person may finish quickly because the tools are familiar. Another may need to search for settings or ask for instructions.
I reduce this gap by creating a standard setup guide.
The guide can show:
Photos can make the guide easier to use than long paragraphs. A clear setting sheet also helps when a new employee joins the team.
Toyota’s production system is often linked with reducing waste and improving flow. One useful lesson is that standard work gives people a stable method to improve. Without a shared method, every change becomes a personal habit.
Check quality during production
Late inspection can create a large amount of rework.
I prefer small checks during production. An operator may check the first piece after setup, then inspect a sample after a set number of units. The exact method depends on the product and the risk involved.
This approach can catch:
The quality team should not be treated as a separate group that only finds faults at the end. Production and quality staff need a shared process. When a problem appears, the team can stop the issue from reaching the next stage.
This may add a few seconds to each batch. It can save hours of sorting and rework later.
Use maintenance to prevent avoidable stops
Unexpected equipment failure can disrupt the schedule and create pressure on operators.
I use a maintenance plan based on actual equipment needs. Basic tasks may include cleaning, lubrication, part inspection, and checking unusual noise or vibration.
Operators can report small signs early. A short report at the end of a shift may prevent a larger repair later.
The plan should not be built around a fixed template alone. A machine that runs every day may need a different check cycle from one used only once a week.
Measure speed and quality together
A shorter production cycle does not help if the defect rate rises.
I track several measures at the same time:
These numbers show whether a change is helping the full process.
For example, a new setup method may reduce production time by thirty minutes but increase rework by two hours. That change does not improve the operation. The team needs to review the full result before keeping it.
Improve one process at a time
Large changes can be difficult to control. I prefer a small test.
The team can choose one product, one machine, or one shift. We record the current result, apply one change, and compare the new result with the old one.
If the change helps, we document it and train the team. If it creates a new issue, we adjust the method.
This keeps improvement connected to daily work. It also gives employees a chance to share ideas based on what they see every day.
Cutting production time and keeping quality high requires more than faster work. It requires fewer waits, clearer instructions, early quality checks, and regular equipment care.
I measure the process before changing it, test one practical improvement, and watch both speed and quality. That method helps a production team build a faster workflow without placing the final product at risk.
When I need to manufacture steel balls faster, I do not start by increasing machine speed. A faster line can create more rejects, surface defects, and unplanned downtime if the material flow is not ready.
The better approach is to shorten each production stage, remove repeated handling, and keep quality checks close to the process.
Steel ball manufacturing usually includes wire or bar preparation, cold heading or hot forming, flashing, heat treatment, grinding, lapping, cleaning, inspection, and packing. Each stage affects the next one. A delay in one area can slow the entire line.
I begin with the steel grade, diameter, hardness target, and surface condition.
Material with inconsistent diameter can cause forming problems. Poor surface quality may create extra grinding work. Mixed material lots can also produce different results during heat treatment.
A practical material check includes:
A supplier making 10 mm carbon steel balls may lose production time when incoming wire requires extra sorting. A clear material specification helps reduce this issue before forming begins.
Manual movement between machines often takes more time than the machining itself.
I prefer a connected material flow:
Shorter travel paths reduce waiting and lower the chance of mixing different grades or sizes.
Simple tools can help. Roller conveyors, collection bins with fixed locations, and clear batch cards may improve flow without changing the whole production line.
Higher machine speed does not always create a faster production result. If dies wear quickly, the line may stop for adjustments or replacement.
I monitor:
A stable speed often gives better output than repeated speed changes. When the process remains steady, operators can detect problems earlier and maintain more consistent steel ball dimensions.
After forming, excess material may remain around the ball. This flashing needs to be removed before grinding.
If the flashing is too large, grinding takes longer. If the forming tool is worn, the problem may appear across an entire batch.
I check sample parts during production instead of waiting until the end of the shift. A quick diameter check and visual inspection can show whether the forming tool needs adjustment.
This small check may prevent a large amount of rework.
Heat treatment affects hardness, wear resistance, and dimensional stability. Poor batch planning can create long queues before the furnace.
I group products by:
Mixing products with different heat treatment needs may increase setup time. A batch plan that uses similar settings can reduce furnace changes and make production easier to track.
The furnace should not be loaded beyond its safe working condition. Uneven loading can cause temperature differences and affect product quality.
Grinding removes surface defects and brings the ball closer to its finished size. Too much allowance creates longer grinding time. Too little allowance may leave defects on the surface.
I set the forming and heat treatment process so the grinding stage receives parts with a controlled allowance.
For a precision steel ball, the target is not simply faster grinding. The target is stable grinding with fewer repeat passes.
Operators can record:
These records help identify where material is being lost and where the process can be adjusted.
Lapping is often used when a smoother surface and tighter size control are required. If parts enter lapping with different sizes, the machine may need longer processing time.
I separate balls by size and production lot before lapping. Inspection tools should also match the product requirement.
Common checks include:
A production team can use sampling during the run and a final inspection before packing. The inspection plan should reflect the customer’s drawing and agreed quality requirements.
When output drops, I do not record only the total quantity. I also record the reason for lost time.
Useful categories include:
For example, a plant may find that the forming machine is not the main problem. The actual delay may come from waiting for heat treatment or repeated grinding. This type of record helps the team work on the real cause.
Clear work instructions help operators make similar decisions across different shifts.
The instructions can show:
Training should use actual samples from the production line. A good sample and a rejected sample are often easier to understand than a long written explanation.
The faster way to manufacture steel balls is usually a combination of small changes:
When I review a steel ball production line, I look at the complete process rather than one machine. Speed comes from better flow, fewer repeated operations, and earlier problem detection. A reliable production plan can support higher output while keeping size, hardness, roundness, and surface requirements under control.
Many metal parts begin as wire, yet the final shape may include a head, shoulder, recess, or reduced section. Machining can produce these details, but it may also create more scrap and extend cycle time. When I review a high-volume fastener project, I often look at cold heading before recommending a cutting-based process.
Cold heading forms metal wire at room temperature through controlled pressure. A series of dies and punches moves the material into the required shape. The process is widely used for bolts, screws, rivets, pins, and other small metal parts.
I usually break cold heading into four practical stages:
Wire preparation
The manufacturer selects wire based on the part material, diameter, strength, and forming needs. Steel, stainless steel, aluminum, copper, and some alloy materials may be suitable after a forming review.
The wire is cleaned, coated, and cut into slugs or fed from a coil. Surface condition matters because dirt, scale, or poor lubrication can affect die life and part quality.
Material placement
The wire slug enters the forming station. The machine positions it with controlled feed length and alignment.
Small changes in feed length can change the head height or shank length. I treat this measurement as a production control point rather than a minor setup detail.
Shape forming
Punches apply force to move the metal into the die cavity. A simple part may need one forming hit. A part with a recessed head, shoulder, or stepped profile may require several stations.
The metal flows instead of being removed. This helps preserve material and can support a continuous grain flow around the formed area.
Inspection and secondary work
The formed part is checked for dimensions, cracks, surface marks, head fill, and alignment. Some parts need thread rolling, trimming, drilling, heat treatment, plating, or another finishing step.
Cold heading does not remove every later operation. Its value comes from reducing the amount of work required after the main shape has been formed.
A cold heading line can reduce the amount of material that becomes chips. This is useful for parts made from stainless steel or other higher-cost materials.
The cycle can also be shorter than a process that cuts every feature from bar stock. A multi-station machine forms several features during one pass, so the production flow may be easier to repeat across large batches.
Part strength is another factor. Forming can support grain flow around the head and shank. The final result still depends on the material grade, forming method, heat treatment, and inspection plan. A drawing review is needed before making any strength claim.
I also look at consistency. Once the dies, feed system, and machine settings are properly developed, the process can produce many similar parts with limited variation. Tool wear still needs monitoring. A worn punch may cause head diameter changes, offset features, or surface defects.
Consider an M8 flange bolt used in an equipment assembly.
A machining route may start with a longer bar, turn the shank, cut the head profile, and create the flange. Each operation removes material and adds handling steps.
A cold heading route may use wire close to the required volume. One station forms the bolt head, another creates the flange shape, and a later operation rolls the thread. The producer still needs heat treatment and surface finishing when the specification calls for them.
This approach may reduce scrap and support a steady output when the order quantity is large enough to justify forming dies and setup work. For a small batch with frequent design changes, machining may be easier to manage.
I do not recommend cold heading based on shape alone. Several questions need answers:
Very hard materials may require annealing between operations. A complex shape may need multiple forming stages, special tooling, or a different production method. A design made for machining may not be suitable for cold heading without changes to radii, lengths, and feature placement.
A useful design review often checks the head-to-shank ratio, material volume, corner radius, draft, and likely forming load. Small geometry changes can make a part easier to form and reduce tool stress.
I normally ask for a 2D drawing, 3D model, material grade, expected quantity, tolerance list, and surface requirements. These details help separate a possible cold heading project from a project that needs another process.
A sample run can reveal issues that are hard to predict from a drawing. During the trial, I check:
This information gives the production team a clearer basis for cost and timing discussions.
Cold heading can change the way a small metal part is made. It may lower material waste, reduce cutting work, and support repeatable output for suitable designs. The result depends on part geometry, material behavior, tooling, machine setup, and inspection.
When I compare processes, I do not look only at the machine cycle. I look at the full path from wire preparation to finished part. That view helps identify where cold heading fits, where secondary operations remain, and where a different method may be more practical.
We has extensive experience in Industry Field. Contact us for professional advice:anqingjichuang: info@aqballgrinder.com/WhatsApp 18055626858.
ASM International (2015) ASM Handbook Volume 14A Metalworking Bulk Forming
A Ghosh and A K Mallik (2016) Manufacturing Technology Metal Forming and Machining
American Society for Metals (2019) Cold Heading and Cold Forming Processes
Serope Kalpakjian and Steven R Schmid (2020) Manufacturing Engineering and Technology
International Organization for Standardization (2017) ISO 3290 Rolling Bearings Balls
American Bearing Manufacturers Association (2021) Steel Ball Quality and Manufacturing Practices
Achieve reliable precision with our spherical-base magnetic machine, engineered to deliver exceptional roundness and consistent performance across demanding applications. Its carefully designed sph
Say goodbye to costly downtime with our reliable
Leading manufacturers choose our Precision Steel Bal
Mastering Ball Grinding Machin
Email to this supplier
ANQING MACHINE TOOL CO.，LTD
EMAIL : info@aqballgrinder.com
ADD. : No. 136-1, Jixian North Road,, Anqing, Anhui China
Privacy statement: Your privacy is very important to Us. Our company promises not to disclose your personal information to any external company with out your explicit permission.
Fill in more information so that we can get in touch with you faster
Privacy statement: Your privacy is very important to Us. Our company promises not to disclose your personal information to any external company with out your explicit permission.
